I can point to several specific things that have dramatically slowed consumer adoption of 3D in the home, of which the blame can be fairly distributed among both hardware and content producers. On the content side, there's plenty of blame to go around. For example, Panasonic's exclusive lock on James Cameron's Avatar on Blu-Ray 3D is one; they're holding hostage one of the few exceptional pieces of 3D material that really sells the 3D experience. Pricing for Blu-Ray 3D is another, as few (sane) people are going to spend $40 plus for one movie - 3D or not. Many will also point out that few television genres outside of sports that have even attempted to do much with 3D technology. The hardware side is a more interesting debate. Some will say that the cost premium for a 3DTV over a regular HDTV is to blame, although I whole-heartedly disagree . Even last year, 3D's first big breakout year, Samsung and Panasonic both had 3D capable sets at pretty reasonable prices. Sure, a premium over an equivalent HD only model, but not enough so that those interested in 3D wouldn't find value in the difference. I'll place all the hardware blame...
blu ray dvd blue ray disk blu ray burner samsung blu ray player best blu ray player dvd blue ray players 3d blu ray movies blueray blue ray dvd blue ray movies blue ray players blue ray dvd player
No comments:
Post a Comment